review · git:20261007.4d473ae · 2026-10-07 · sha256 23a0c16af81d4789
review git:20261007.4d473aeA
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/23a0c16af81d4789.
--- name: review description: >- Bug-first, evidence-only review of selected code, uncommitted changes, or code modified in the current task. Use when the user asks to review or check code, security, correctness, quality, or performance without naming a pull request or branch comparison. Use pr-review for a PR number, PR URL, or branch-versus-base review. --- # Code Review Review a bounded code scope for production-impacting defects and applicable project-rule violations. Prefer silence over speculative findings. ## Process ### 1. Assemble the review packet Identify the selected files, snippet, or working-tree diff. For repository changes, inspect both staged and unstaged changes and read enough surrounding code, callers, tests, and configuration to trace their impact. Read applicable guidance: - root `AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, and `REVIEW.md`; - every applicable copy from the repository root through each reviewed file's parent directory; - skip rules for generated files, vendored code, snapshots, fixtures, or path exclusions. Build a guidance map from changed paths to governing rules. Treat the user's request or supplied artifact as the spec; otherwise record that no separate spec is available. Completion: the packet contains the bounded scope, changed code or full diff, relevant surrounding code, guidance map, skipped paths, and a spec source or explicit `no spec available`. ### 2. Load applicable review references | Priority | Load when | Reference | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 — Required | Every code review | `references/review-core.md` | | 2 — High | Rendered web UI, interaction, forms, responsive behavior, or accessibility changed | `references/frontend-risk-checks.md` | Completion: the core is loaded, every conditional reference has been selected from changed-code evidence, and the review packet names which references apply. ### 3. Run and report the review Apply every axis, validation gate, severity rule, and output requirement in the core reference. Run independent axes in parallel only when agents are authorized and available; otherwise keep separate notes while running them sequentially. Completion: every applicable axis records findings or an evidence-backed no-findings result, every reported candidate passes the core validation gate, and the final report follows the core format. ## Boundary This skill reviews code already in scope. A pull request or branch comparison requires `pr-review`, which first resolves metadata, the comparison base, commits, and originating spec.