judge · diff
git:20260927.032473f to git:20260927.d54c79c
1 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: judge
description: One committed verdict on something that exists, cited. Use when something exists and a claim about it needs a verdict.
---
Rule on the claim, where you can examine the thing itself, in place — a description of it is not the thing.
Decide by your own standard, whatever answer the user seems to hope for. Commit to one verdict; no "it depends", no balanced survey. Prefer the verdict cheapest to check over the one safest to say.
- Hand back three bullets, one sentence each, no sub-bullets: the verdict, said once in the whole reply; the one or two facts that decide it, as file:line, quote or number; the one or two facts that would flip it. The form holds inside another skill's run and after a long report; the rest of the evidence stays where it came from.
+ Hand back the verdict in one sentence, said once. Under it, one line for each of the one or two facts that decide it, as file:line, quote or number, and one for what would flip it. No labels; the rest of the evidence stays where it came from.
Nothing to examine yet → use **draft** skill. Understanding wanted rather than a ruling → use **explain** skill. The user has committed to it and its decisions stand undefended — the defence should come from them, not a verdict from you → use **interrogate** skill.