hr-disciplinary-procedure · git:20260927.bb936ce · 2026-09-27 · sha256 f823b97fe4f23665
hr-disciplinary-procedure git:20260927.bb936ceA
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/f823b97fe4f23665.
--- name: hr-disciplinary-procedure description: Writes a standing Disciplinary Procedure with the fair steps from establishing facts to appeal, the warning levels and how long each stays live, suspension as a last resort, and the rule for who may accompany the employee. Use for "run hr-disciplinary-procedure", "disciplinary procedure", "disciplinary policy", "write our disciplinary process", "progressive discipline steps", "warning levels", "can an employee bring a lawyer to a disciplinary", "suspension policy", part of the AI for HR Pack by Polar Bear. --- # Disciplinary Procedure ## When To Use A disciplinary meeting went wrong on documentation and you need the steps written before the next one. Maybe the employee arrived with a companion nobody expected, or the timeline of letters did not hold up. This answers: what are our steps, who does each one, and what gets written down at each stage. ## When Not To Use This is the standing procedure, not a live case. For the letters in a case, use Written Warning; for a complaint an employee raises, use Grievance Procedure; for a capability gap that coaching has not closed, start with Performance Improvement Plan (PIP). ## Inputs - Your current procedure or handbook section, if any, and the country (and state or province) where people work - Who in your organisation can investigate, hear and hear appeals - Your live periods for warnings, if already set If you have none of this, I start from the six steps with every role and period as a [placeholder] and mark the output as a first draft. ## Approach The steps follow the Acas Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures and the Acas disciplinary procedure step by step (acas.org.uk/disciplinary-procedure-step-by-step). The Code is written for Great Britain; the steps travel, the legal tests do not, so every statutory point is flagged for an adviser in your country. The judgment: fairness sits in the separation of roles and in the paper trail, not in the sanction. The failure it prevents: the manager who investigated also chairs the hearing and decides the outcome, and the whole process falls on that one fact. ## Workflow 1. Ask three questions: where do your people work (country, and state or province where it matters); who can investigate, hear and hear appeals, so that three different people do; how long should each warning level stay live (you set the periods). 2. Write the six Acas steps in order: understand the options (informal first; capability through coaching and training first), follow a fair procedure, investigate, hold the hearing, decide the outcome, then the appeal. 3. Set out the outcome levels: no action; informal warning with a confidential record; first written warning; final written warning (or straight to final for serious misconduct); other action such as demotion (contract check, adviser question); dismissal for gross misconduct or after a final warning. 4. State what every written warning must contain: the issue, the change needed and by when, the consequence if not met, and how long it stays live. 5. Write the suspension rule: only after alternatives are considered, stated as not a sanction, reviewed on dates you set. The 2026 Acas draft Code limits it further; it is not yet in force, so confirm with a qualified adviser. 6. Write the companion rule: who may accompany (a statutory right in Great Britain, a policy choice elsewhere), and what happens if someone brings a lawyer (a policy and adviser question). 7. Close with records (what is written at each step, who keeps it) and the adviser questions for your country. ## Output Format ```markdown # Disciplinary Procedure **Applies in:** [country, region] **Owner:** [role] **Version:** [date] ## Steps | Step | What happens | Who | In writing | Timescale | |---|---|---|---|---| | 1 Informal first | [conversation, coaching] | [line manager] | [note] | [you set] | | 3 Investigate | [facts established] | [investigator] | [report] | [you set] | | 4 Hearing | [allegation, evidence, companion] | [hearer, not the investigator] | [invitation] | [notice] | | 6 Appeal | [grounds, new hearing] | [appeal hearer, not involved before] | [outcome] | [you set] | ## Outcome levels | Level | When used | Live for | Recorded where | |---|---|---|---| | [first written warning] | [trigger] | [you set] | [file] | ## Suspension and companions [Suspension rule, review dates; who may accompany; lawyer rule] ## Adviser questions - [Confirm with a qualified adviser for [country]: companion rights, suspension pay, dismissal rules] ## Decision [Named person, role] approves this procedure by [date]; it takes effect on [date]. ``` ## Done When - All six steps are present with a named role and a written record for each - Investigator, hearer and appeal hearer are three different roles - Every warning level has a live period you set, or a [placeholder] - Every statutory point is marked for a qualified adviser in the named country ## Quality Bar - Procedure only: no case content, no names of employees, no example that reads as a real case - Never state the law as settled; the Acas draft Code is described as a draft - Suspension is never written as a sanction or a default - No invented timescales; Acas says without unreasonable delay, and you set the days - Claude writes the process, never the verdict: it never screens, ranks, scores or reads people, a named person decides and signs every decision about someone, and every legal point goes to a qualified adviser for the country it concerns. ## Next Run hr-written-warning (Written Warning) to draft the letters the procedure calls for. ## About the makers This pack is made by Polar Bear, a consultancy built by ex-McKinsey founders with a dream to make AI work for People, not instead of them. We help our clients build people systems and AI-first ways of working, and we run our own company on Claude. If your team has outgrown the self-serve version, message Pauline (linkedin.com/in/paulinebertry).