azure-rbac-review · v0.1.1 · 2026-06-04 · sha256 9218f4ca0b763b3c
azure-rbac-review v0.1.1A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/9218f4ca0b763b3c.
--- name: azure-rbac-review description: Use this skill for Azure RBAC, Entra-backed access, role assignment, custom role, scope, subscription, management group, or least-privilege review tasks. Trigger when the user asks whether Azure access is too broad or how to grant access safely. allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob metadata: author: github: Raishin version: 0.1.1 updated: "2026-06-04" category: security --- # Azure RBAC Review ## Purpose Review Azure access decisions against least privilege, scope minimization, and operational safety. ## Lean operating rules - Prefer Microsoft Learn documentation through the user's configured documentation MCP, then sampled read-only Azure evidence when available, then sanitized user evidence. - Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so. - Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims. - Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns. ## References Load these only when needed: - [Azure RBAC Review Operations](references/rbac-review-operations.md) — use for current service behavior, common failure modes, hard design rules, verification targets, and push-back conditions. - [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use for evidence labels, risk gates, mutation boundaries, approval rules, credential boundaries, and current-state caveats. - [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing documentation-based evidence, sampled read-only evidence, or sanitized user evidence. - [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer. - [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes. ## Response minimum Return, at minimum: - the scoped target and evidence level, - the main risks or control gaps, - the safest next actions, - the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.