customer-research · diff
git:20260828.f80dcb5 to git:20260916.e72e404
7 added, 0 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: customer-research
description: Plans, runs, and synthesizes customer research — interviews, surveys, win-loss analysis, and message testing — into findings that change decisions. Use this when the customer is being guessed at, before positioning or a major launch, when churn or conversion has an unexplained cause, or when a team is arguing from anecdotes. Also use to turn raw interview notes into usable findings.
---
# Customer research
Research earns its cost only if a decision hangs on it. Name that decision before recruiting anyone.
## Choose the method by question
- **Why did this happen / what do they actually do** — interviews. Small n, deep.
- **How common is this** — survey. Only after interviews have told you what to ask; a survey written
from assumptions returns your assumptions.
- **Why did we win or lose** — win-loss, with losses weighted higher. Losses are where the truth is
and are systematically under-sampled.
- **Which framing works** — message testing against a real choice, not a preference rating.
## Interviewing
Ask about the past, not the future. "What did you do last time" is evidence; "would you use this"
is politeness.
- Open broad, follow the energy, and go quiet after their first answer — the second one is where the
substance is.
- Chase specifics: when, what happened next, what did that cost you, who else was involved.
- Never describe your solution before you have their problem in their words. Once they know what you
want to hear, the interview is over.
- Watch for the workaround. Anything someone has built a spreadsheet to survive is a validated
problem.
## Synthesizing
Code the transcripts before forming a view — findings assembled to support an existing belief will
be. For each finding record: the claim, how many independently said it, a verbatim quote, and what
would change if it is true. A finding that changes nothing is trivia.
Separate what people **said**, what they **did**, and what you **inferred**. Conflating the three is
the most common way research misleads.
+ ## Sources
+
+ `references/sources.md` in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions
+ here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before
+ answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free
+ to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.
+
## Never
- Recruit only happy customers. The sample that answers your email is not your market.
- Lead: "How much would this feature help?" has one answer.
- Present a single interview as a finding.