think-woop · v0.1.0 · 2026-06-01 · sha256 dc5d4e6039b5da2f
think-woop v0.1.0A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/dc5d4e6039b5da2f.
--- name: think-woop description: Produces a WOOP commitment card by working through Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, and Plan - contrasting the desired outcome against the main internal obstacle and binding an if-then response to it. Use when a goal is already chosen but follow-through keeps failing, or to close the gap between intention and action. license: Apache-2.0 metadata: id: thinking-framework-skills.woop family: risk-and-resilience evidence-tier: "S" version: 0.1.0 standard: "0.8" --- <!-- thinking-framework-skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills | Apache-2.0 --> # WOOP (Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions) A decided goal often dies in the gap between intention and action. WOOP closes it with two evidence-backed moves: contrast the desired outcome against the obstacle in your way, then pre-bind an if-then response. Wish (specific, challenging, feasible), Outcome (vividly imagine the best result), Obstacle (the main internal obstacle in yourself), Plan (if [obstacle or its cue], then [action]). The output is a **WOOP card**. Critical: imagining the outcome *without* contrasting the obstacle measurably reduces follow-through - the obstacle and the if-then plan are mandatory, not decoration. ## When to Use - A goal is already chosen and feasible, but follow-through keeps failing. - Closing a personal or single-owner intention-action gap. - Turning a commitment into something that survives the moment of temptation or friction. ## When NOT to Use - To decide *what* to pursue (use a decision skill); WOOP commits to an already-chosen wish. - For multi-person project planning (it is about one actor's follow-through). - When the obstacle is an external blocker outside your control (WOOP works on internal obstacles). - As motivational positive-outcome talk: outcome-only, without the obstacle, backfires. ## Instructions When asked to run WOOP, follow these steps: 1. **Wish.** State the goal in one line. It should be specific, challenging, and genuinely feasible. If it is not feasible, say so - WOOP will surface disengagement, and that is honest, not a failure. 2. **Outcome.** Name the single best result of fulfilling the wish, vividly and concretely. One line. 3. **Obstacle.** Identify the main *internal* obstacle in yourself that stands in the way (a habit, fear, impulse, avoidance), not an external blocker. This is the step that does the work; do not skip it. 4. **Plan.** Write one or more if-then statements: "If [obstacle or the situation that triggers it], then I will [specific, doable action]." Make the action concrete enough to execute without deciding again. 5. **Emit the WOOP card** per `references/TEMPLATE.md`. ## Output Format Use the template in `references/TEMPLATE.md`. The deliverable is the four-part card with a concrete if-then plan, not prose or a pep talk. ## Quality Checklist Before finalizing, verify: - [ ] The Wish is specific, challenging, and feasible (or infeasibility is named honestly). - [ ] The Obstacle is internal and controllable, not an external blocker. - [ ] The Plan is a concrete if-then statement, not a vague intention. - [ ] The obstacle step is present (outcome-only is rejected because it backfires). - [ ] The output is the WOOP card artifact, not a motivational essay. ## Evidence Tier **S**. Mental contrasting with implementation intentions improves goal attainment across 25+ randomized controlled trials in health, academic, and work domains (Oettingen; Gollwitzer; Wang et al. 2021 meta-analysis) - among the best-evidenced behavior-change methods. Note the honest inversion: positive outcome fantasy *without* the obstacle reduces follow-through, so the obstacle and if-then plan are mandatory. The evidence is for humans doing WOOP on their own goals, transferred to AI use, not AI-validated. Full grading: `evidence/dossier.md`. ## Examples See `references/EXAMPLE.md` for a completed WOOP card.