Standard Review Policy for Downstream SKILL.md skillA

This file is byte-identical to the first copy the registry indexed. Same content hash, so the same checks give both the same grade.

Standard Review Policy for Downstream from s977043/river-review is an agent skill: a SKILL.md folder an AI agent loads when a task calls for it.

Install it, pinned
mdr add s977043/river-review/Standard Review Policy for Downstream@v0.1.0

Pins v0.1.0 in mdr.lock. Pin the fingerprint instead.

Audit grade
A, 17 of 17 checks passed
Kind
SKILL.md skill
Repository
s977043/river-review
Path
plugin-dist/river-review/skills/downstream/review-policy-standard-downstream/SKILL.md
Versions recorded
1
Latest version
v0.1.0, committed Oct 25, 2026
Size
3,648 bytes
Repository stars
7
License
MIT

Applies standard AI review policy guidelines for downstream (test/QA) phase reviews.

Collected from public GitHub. Every version is saved exactly as it was and never changes. Install it at an exact version with the mdr tool, and every file is checked before it reaches your agent. The main file is checked against the SHA-256 fingerprint recorded here, and the others against the fingerprints GitHub keeps for its source commit. The automatic checks below grade the latest version, and the same checks always give the same file the same grade.

What the file says

## Goal / 目的

- テスト/QA フェーズの差分に対して、テスト不足・失敗系の抜け・フレークのリスクを短く指摘する。

## Non-goals / 扱わないこと

- 変更と無関係な “テストを増やすべき” の一般論を言わない。
- プロジェクトのテスト方針(E2E/Unit 比率など)を断定して押し付けない。

## False-positive guards / 抑制条件

- 変更がテストの整形/リネームのみで、意味的な変更がない場合は深入りしない。
- テスト観点が不確実な場合は、欠陥ではなく質問として提示する。

## Rule / ルール

- 指摘は差分に紐づける(根拠は `<file>:<line>`)。
- 優先する観点は「失敗系」「境界」「クリティカルパス」(例: 認証、課金、データ整合性、権限)。
- 可能なら最小の追加テスト案を 1 つ添える(大改造ではなく追加 1 ケース)。

## Evidence / 根拠

- 追加/変更された分岐や例外パスに対して、対応するテスト差分がない点を根拠として示す。

## Output / 出力

- 各指摘を 1 行で出力する: `<file>:<line>: <message>`
- `<message>` は日本語で簡潔に(目安: 200 文字以内)。
- PR の本文(説明)と PR コメント(レビューコメント)は日本語で書く。
- 最大 8 件。指摘がなければ `NO_ISSUES` のみ。

## Heuristics / 判定の手がかり(例)

- 新規/変更された分岐に対するテストが増えていない
- 例外/エラー戻りのアサーションがない(メッセージ、ステータス、code など)
- 時刻/乱数/外部依存でフレークしやすい構造になっている(固定化/モック不足)
- セットアップが重複し、テスト意図が読み取りにくい

## 評価指標(Evaluation)

- 合格基準: 指摘が差分に紐づき、根拠と次アクションが説明されている。
- 不合格基準: 差分と無関係な指摘、根拠のない断定、抑制条件の無視。

## 人間に返す条件(Human Handoff)

- 仕様や意図が不明確で解釈が分かれる場合は質問として返す。
- 影響範囲が広い設計判断やトレードオフは人間レビューへ返す。

## レビュー姿勢(Standard of Code Review)

- テスト / QA レビューでも完璧を求めず、「このテスト追加 / 修正が回帰検出と保守性を改善するか」を判断軸にする (`google/eng-practices` の "Improve the overall code health" 原則)。
…

Read the whole file at its exact version.

How to install

The exact contents, by fingerprint
mdr add s977043/river-review/Standard Review Policy for Downstream@sha256:7379a364e44fbec5

The line at the top of this page pins the label v0.1.0, which is what most people want. This one pins the sha256 fingerprint of the contents instead, so it survives a label being moved. Either way the exact version is written to mdr.lock, and mdr install downloads and checks those contents again, so it installs them exactly or stops with an error.

Badge

mdr badge

[![mdr](https://markdownregistry.com/badge/art_unitrq6x7mrnwa3g.svg)](https://markdownregistry.com/a/art_unitrq6x7mrnwa3g)

3 badge image fetches in 30 days. What the badge shows.

Versions

The registry has recorded 1 version of this file, committed on Oct 25, 2026.

versioncommittedcommitsizeaudit
v0.1.0 latest2026-10-25 aac3ee8 3,648 BA view

Audit of the latest version

A  17 of 17 checks passed. Fixed automatic checks with no AI involved, so the same checks give the same answer every run.
  • pass: Frontmatter block present
  • pass: Frontmatter declares a name
  • pass: Frontmatter declares a description
  • pass: Size between 200 bytes and 200 KB (3648 bytes)
  • pass: No zero-width or bidi control characters
  • pass: No instruction hidden inside an HTML comment
  • pass: No link to an exfiltration or paste host
  • pass: No credential-shaped string
  • pass: No instruction to send local credentials anywhere
  • pass: No text hidden with inline styles
  • pass: No prompt-injection phrasing
  • pass: No curl or wget piped into a shell
  • pass: No recursive delete of root, home or parent
  • pass: No instruction to read or print local credentials
  • pass: No base64 blob over 200 characters
  • pass: No link to a raw IP address
  • pass: No script tag

Source

GitHub

s977043/river-review · 7 stars · license MIT · pushed 2026-11-08 · branch main

API

GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/artifacts/art_unitrq6x7mrnwa3g
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/resolve?ref=s977043/river-review/Standard Review Policy for Downstream
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/blob/7379a364e44fbec560d4950ae15aa621f7e4aeb49a715b889f25a575e4bfb89d

Your AI assistant does the legwork. You hear about the deals worth your word. Hand yours the standing instructions at modelranch.com and it joins the network that reads files like this one.

Guides: the SKILL.md format and its required fields · what to check before you install a skill · how to pin a skill to an exact version · where to find agent skills · keeping a team on the same skills · which agent file does what.

More from s977043/river-review

ask-codex SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · .claude/skills/ask-codex/SKILL.md · Get a second opinion or independent review from Codex (OpenAI) via the local Codex CLI. Use when the user wants Codex…
git:20260724.d54eafd · audit A · 7 stars
river-review-discipline SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · .claude/skills/river-review-discipline/SKILL.md · AI 駆動開発のレビュー品質を安定化させるレビュー規律。レビュー対象を分類し、要件・設計・差分・検証・報告を分けて見て、根拠に基づき approved / needs_revision / blocked / rejected…
git:20260707.9c35a5d · audit A · 7 stars
skill-creator SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · .claude/skills/skill-creator/SKILL.md · Design a new Claude Code skill from a concrete use case and produce a repo-ready skill package. Use when the user asks…
git:20261004.95d1f7a · audit A · 7 stars
skill-ops-planner SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · .claude/skills/skill-ops-planner/SKILL.md · Create an operating policy and roadmap for a live portfolio of Claude Code skills. Use when the user asks to organize…
git:20260321.857d5ca · audit A · 7 stars
skill-optimizer SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · .claude/skills/skill-optimizer/SKILL.md · Evaluate and improve an existing Claude Code skill using explicit success criteria and small controlled changes. Use…
git:20261004.95d1f7a · audit A · 7 stars
AGENTS.md@.codex AGENTS.md file
s977043/river-review · .codex/AGENTS.md
git:20260923.5650e78 · audit A · 7 stars
AGENTS.md AGENTS.md file
s977043/river-review · AGENTS.md
git:20261008.d74129b · audit B · 7 stars
CLAUDE.md CLAUDE.md file
s977043/river-review · CLAUDE.md
git:20261016.787c99c · audit A · 7 stars
Sample Architecture Consistency Review SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · examples/skills/architecture-sample/SKILL.md · Checks design/ADR docs for consistency and missing decisions.
v0.1.0 · audit A · 7 stars
Sample Code Quality Pass SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · examples/skills/code-quality-sample/SKILL.md · Checks common code quality and maintainability risks.
v0.1.0 · audit A · 7 stars
Sample Test Coverage Review SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · examples/skills/test-review-sample/SKILL.md · Evaluates downstream tests for coverage and edge cases.
v0.1.0 · audit A · 7 stars
adversarial-review SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · plugin-dist/river-review/skills/agent-skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md · 敵対的分析手法を統合したレビューの entry skill。認知バイアス対策の3手法 (Pre-mortem / War Game / Logic Torturing)と、宣言・主張と実態の乖離を突く claim-vs-actual…
v0.1.0 · audit A · 7 stars

Every file in s977043/river-review

Other files named Standard Review Policy for Downstream

Standard Review Policy for Downstream SKILL.md skill
s977043/river-review · skills/downstream/review-policy-standard-downstream/SKILL.md · Applies standard AI review policy guidelines for downstream (test/QA) phase reviews.
v0.1.0 · audit A · 7 stars

Browse by kind, by grade A, or by owner.