outbound-prospecting · diff
git:20260901.aa45383 to git:20260901.0757404
10 added, 0 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: outbound-prospecting
description: Finds, qualifies, and reaches prospects through cold outreach — list building, qualification criteria, cold email and multi-channel sequences, and the follow-up that actually gets replies. Use this to build a prospect list, write cold outreach, fix a sequence that is not getting responses, define qualification criteria, or decide whether a segment is worth pursuing.
---
# Outbound prospecting
Reply rates are set by list quality far more than by copy. Most outbound problems are targeting
problems being solved as writing problems.
## Build the list before writing anything
Define the qualifying signal — the observable fact that means this account probably has the problem
you solve, right now. Hiring for a role, using a specific tool, a recent funding or expansion
announcement, a public complaint about the thing you fix.
Without a signal you are sending to a demographic, and a demographic has no reason to reply.
Then qualify each account against: do they have the problem, can they afford it, can this person
act, and is there a reason for now. Missing the last one is why good-fit prospects go quiet.
## Writing
- **Under a hundred words.** Longer gets skimmed and deleted.
- **Open with the signal, specifically.** Show you looked. Generic personalization tokens are worse
than none — they signal automation while pretending otherwise.
- **One problem, in their language**, not your feature.
- **Ask for something small.** A specific question or a fifteen-minute call. "Interested in
learning more" asks the recipient to do the work of defining the next step.
- **No attachments, minimal links** in a first message. Both hurt deliverability and trust.
## Sequencing
Three to five touches over two to three weeks. Each one adds something new — a different angle, a
relevant case, a useful resource. Never "just bumping this to the top of your inbox," which
communicates that the first message was not worth reading either.
Multi-channel works when the channels are coordinated and the sender is a person. It reads as
harassment when the same message arrives everywhere at once.
Stop after the sequence ends. Persistence past that converts nothing and costs reputation.
## Deliverability
Domain warmed, authentication configured, volume per mailbox kept low, list validated. A technically
broken send makes perfect copy irrelevant, and the damage to a sending domain takes months to
repair.
Use a subdomain for outbound so a reputation problem cannot take down your transactional mail.
## Reading results
- **No opens** — deliverability or subject line. Check deliverability first.
- **Opens, no replies** — the message is not landing. Usually the ask, or an unclear problem
statement.
- **Replies, no meetings** — a qualification problem: you are reaching people who cannot act.
- **Meetings, no pipeline** — the segment is wrong.
+ ## Tooling
+
+ Sequencing: Outreach, Salesloft, Apollo, Lemlist, Instantly, and similar.
+
+ Contact data: ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clay, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, and similar. Every
+ provider's data decays; verify before you send, whichever you buy.
+
+ Deliverability: a separate sending domain, plus warmup and monitoring — Instantly,
+ Smartlead, Google Postmaster Tools, and similar.
+
## Never
- Send before the list is qualified. A good message to the wrong person is still a bad message.
- Send outbound from the domain that carries your customer and billing mail. Prospecting burns sender reputation; keep it on a separate domain.
- Keep sequencing someone who replied. Pull them out the moment a human is in the thread.
- Judge a sequence on open rates. Opens are unreliable and unactionable; judge on replies and meetings held.