Critique an implemented interface using evidence-based findings prioritized by user impact, severity, scope, and practical remediation.
Collected from public GitHub. Every version is saved exactly as it was and never changes. Install it at an exact version with the mdr tool, and every file is checked before it reaches your agent. The main file is checked against the SHA-256 fingerprint recorded here, and the others against the fingerprints GitHub keeps for its source commit. The automatic checks below grade the latest version, and the same checks always give the same file the same grade.
What the file says
# Design review
## When to use
Use when reviewing an existing page, visual implementation, screenshot, component library, design-system change, or pull request affecting UI quality.
## Workflow
### 1. Establish review context
Identify intended users, primary tasks, target viewports, brand constraints, supported browsers, and the state being reviewed. Inspect project documentation and available source. Do not judge a screenshot as though it reveals behavior that is not visible.
### 2. Review in priority order
- **P0 — Blocking:** a major task cannot be completed, a severe accessibility barrier exists, destructive behavior is ambiguous, or critical content is hidden.
- **P1 — High impact:** the primary action is hard to find, information hierarchy fails, a major layout breaks on supported screens, or keyboard operation is materially blocked.
- **P2 — Moderate:** patterns are inconsistent, secondary hierarchy is weak, responsive density is awkward, or state feedback is unclear but not blocking.
- **P3 — Polish:** minor spacing, alignment, motion, or finish improvements with limited impact on outcomes.
…
The line at the top of this page pins the label git:20261010.15b3ad6, which is what most people want. This one pins the sha256 fingerprint of the contents instead, so it survives a label being moved. Either way the exact version is written to mdr.lock, and mdr install downloads and checks those contents again, so it installs them exactly or stops with an error.
A 17 of 17 checks passed. Fixed automatic checks with no AI involved, so the same checks give the same answer every run.
pass: Frontmatter block present
pass: Frontmatter declares a name
pass: Frontmatter declares a description
pass: Size between 200 bytes and 200 KB (2885 bytes)
pass: No zero-width or bidi control characters
pass: No instruction hidden inside an HTML comment
pass: No link to an exfiltration or paste host
pass: No credential-shaped string
pass: No instruction to send local credentials anywhere
pass: No text hidden with inline styles
pass: No prompt-injection phrasing
pass: No curl or wget piped into a shell
pass: No recursive delete of root, home or parent
pass: No instruction to read or print local credentials
pass: No base64 blob over 200 characters
pass: No link to a raw IP address
pass: No script tag
Source
GitHub
realtask/max-design · 4 stars · license MIT · pushed 2026-10-13 · branch main
API
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/artifacts/art_5thalqpft36i3tin
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/resolve?ref=realtask/max-design/design-review
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/blob/c27a9ada97bd19db011f55a1fbfa7a49f116bd55f12115843ef94d0031ee0de8
Your AI assistant does the legwork. You hear about the deals worth your word. Hand yours the standing instructions at modelranch.com and it joins the network that reads files like this one.
realtask/max-design · skills/data-visualization/SKILL.md · Select, design, label, and verify charts and data displays that help users interpret evidence accurately and accessibly.
realtask/max-design · skills/information-architecture/SKILL.md · Plan and improve navigation, information hierarchy, page structure, findability, and task flows around real user goals.
plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills · .claude/skills/design-review/SKILL.md · Review or audit a design/UI across 6 weighted dimensions with Nielsen's 10 heuristics and a prioritized findings table…
dimetron/pi-go · .pi-go/skills/design-review/SKILL.md · Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension…
striderza/opencodegamestudios · .agents/skills/design-review/SKILL.md · Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project…
striderza/opencodegamestudios · .agents/modules/design/skills/design-review/SKILL.md · Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project…
fusengine/agents · plugins/design-expert/skills/design-review/SKILL.md · Use when a design deliverable is about to be reported done — the final quality gate after design-motion or a mobile…
toongri/oh-my-toong-playground · skills/design-review/SKILL.md · Use for advisory design review — steelman antithesis and tradeoff tension analysis. Triggers include "design review"…
