decision-and-rfc SKILL.md skillA

decision-and-rfc from webkubor/writing-standard-skills is an agent skill: a SKILL.md folder an AI agent loads when a task calls for it.

Install it, pinned
mdr add webkubor/writing-standard-skills/decision-and-rfc@git:20261025.4eaa475

Pins git:20261025.4eaa475 in mdr.lock. Pin the fingerprint instead.

Audit grade
A, 17 of 17 checks passed
Kind
SKILL.md skill
Repository
webkubor/writing-standard-skills
Path
skills/decision-and-rfc/SKILL.md
Versions recorded
1
Latest version
git:20261025.4eaa475, committed Oct 25, 2026
Size
7,182 bytes
Repository stars
6
License
MIT

架构决策记录(ADR)、技术提案(RFC)与重大方案论证的表达规范。基于第一性原理、权衡对齐(Trade-offs)与可证伪性。拒绝报喜不报忧,要求显式声明放弃的代价与推翻条件。触发:"写方案 / 架构决策 / ADR / RFC / 技术提案 / 选型报告 / 为什么选这个 / 方案对比 / 技术立项 / 重构方案"。.

Collected from public GitHub. Every version is saved exactly as it was and never changes. Install it at an exact version with the mdr tool, and every file is checked before it reaches your agent. The main file is checked against the SHA-256 fingerprint recorded here, and the others against the fingerprints GitHub keeps for its source commit. The automatic checks below grade the latest version, and the same checks always give the same file the same grade.

What the file says

# 架构决策记录(ADR)与技术方案(RFC)表达规范

架构与方案的本质是**在冲突的约束中做权衡(Trade-offs)**。没有完美的架构,只有适合当前阶段约束的妥协。

**只写优点、不写代价的技术方案,是不诚实的欺骗。** 一份深度的架构决策,必须清晰交代:**为什么现有机制不可用、选它的代价是什么、放弃了哪些备选方案,以及在什么条件下本方案必须被推翻。**

---

## 零、ADR / RFC 五步骨架(The Decision Skeleton)

动笔撰写任何技术提案、重构方案或架构决策前,按此骨架填空:

```
① 本质矛盾   第一性原理下钻 · 当前物理瓶颈是什么 · 不做该方案的年化代价
② 决策结论   选了什么方案 · 核心架构图 · 数据流与契约约束
③ 权衡矩阵   获得了什么 vs 付出了什么代价 · 引入的新复杂度由什么机制兜底
④ 方案墓碑   考虑过的备选方案 B/C · 在当前什么事实下被否决(防止后人重复讨论)
⑤ 推翻条件   可证伪性 · 当什么指标突破阈值时,本架构必须被推翻重做
```

---

## 一、关键段落表达规范

### 1. 本质矛盾(Problem Definition)
- **先问第一性原理**:问题本质是性能不够、模型能力不足、还是流程设计错误?
- **量化不做该方案的代价**:
  ```text
  ❌ “当前日志记录比较分散,排查问题不太方便,因此需要统一日志中心。”
  ✅ “当前 5 台服务器日志分散在各机本地,跨机事故定位需串行 SSH 查 5 次,平均 MTTR 为 42 分钟;
     上月因日志分散导致的定位超时事故共 3 起,累计中断 114 分钟。”
  ```

### 2. 权衡矩阵与代价显式化(Trade-offs)
- 必须包含专门的小节:**「我们付出了什么代价(Costs & Limitations)」**。
- 交代三件事:
  - **性能/延迟代价**:增加了几毫秒网络延迟?增加了几倍磁盘读写?
  - **心智/学习代价**:团队理解新方案需要多长时间?API 是否破坏既有习惯?
  - **运维兜底代价**:新依赖挂了怎么办?是否有无状态降级预案?

### 3. 弃用方案墓碑区(Rejected Alternatives)
- **防止团队陷入“月经周期式重提旧方案”的内耗**。
- 记录格式:
  ```markdown
  ### 弃用方案:自建 Kafka 消息队列
  - **为什么考虑过**:吞吐量极大,生态成熟。
  - **为什么在当前阶段否决**:
    1. 需至少 3 节点 ZooKeeper/KRaft 集群,每月闲置硬件成本增加 ¥1200+;
…

Read the whole file at its exact version.

How to install

The exact contents, by fingerprint
mdr add webkubor/writing-standard-skills/decision-and-rfc@sha256:49a39d12c68ebda3

The line at the top of this page pins the label git:20261025.4eaa475, which is what most people want. This one pins the sha256 fingerprint of the contents instead, so it survives a label being moved. Either way the exact version is written to mdr.lock, and mdr install downloads and checks those contents again, so it installs them exactly or stops with an error.

Badge

mdr badge

[![mdr](https://markdownregistry.com/badge/art_b5z4jon4mo5d5pwx.svg)](https://markdownregistry.com/a/art_b5z4jon4mo5d5pwx)

3 badge image fetches in 30 days. What the badge shows.

Versions

The registry has recorded 1 version of this file, committed on Oct 25, 2026.

versioncommittedcommitsizeaudit
git:20261025.4eaa475 latest2026-10-25 4eaa475 7,182 BA view

Audit of the latest version

A  17 of 17 checks passed. Fixed automatic checks with no AI involved, so the same checks give the same answer every run.
  • pass: Frontmatter block present
  • pass: Frontmatter declares a name
  • pass: Frontmatter declares a description
  • pass: Size between 200 bytes and 200 KB (7182 bytes)
  • pass: No zero-width or bidi control characters
  • pass: No instruction hidden inside an HTML comment
  • pass: No link to an exfiltration or paste host
  • pass: No credential-shaped string
  • pass: No instruction to send local credentials anywhere
  • pass: No text hidden with inline styles
  • pass: No prompt-injection phrasing
  • pass: No curl or wget piped into a shell
  • pass: No recursive delete of root, home or parent
  • pass: No instruction to read or print local credentials
  • pass: No base64 blob over 200 characters
  • pass: No link to a raw IP address
  • pass: No script tag

Source

GitHub

webkubor/writing-standard-skills · 6 stars · license MIT · pushed 2026-11-06 · branch main

API

GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/artifacts/art_b5z4jon4mo5d5pwx
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/resolve?ref=webkubor/writing-standard-skills/decision-and-rfc
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/blob/49a39d12c68ebda3702e592b0879bda21037250203d85fd672a584019bb15a67

Your AI assistant does the legwork. You hear about the deals worth your word. Hand yours the standing instructions at modelranch.com and it joins the network that reads files like this one.

Guides: the SKILL.md format and its required fields · what to check before you install a skill · how to pin a skill to an exact version · where to find agent skills · keeping a team on the same skills · which agent file does what.

More from webkubor/writing-standard-skills

AGENTS.md AGENTS.md file
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · AGENTS.md
git:20261025.4eaa475 · audit B · 6 stars
llms.txt llms.txt file
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · llms.txt
git:20261025.6457abe · audit A · 6 stars
account-custody SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/account-custody/SKILL.md · 「账户托管运营前置检查」——Agent 替人接管社交账户(发帖/回复/互动)之前,必须先完成四件事:核对当前平台与入口、加载平台规则红线、读出该账户已有人设与口吻、确认出口 IP…
git:20261105.3275eed · audit A · 6 stars
executive-briefing SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/executive-briefing/SKILL.md · 面向业务负责人、决策者与 owner 的极简汇报与卡单拍板规范。基于低成本沟通(reply-format-low-cost)与终点导向运行模型。严禁倒苦水铺垫过程,将开放性提问收敛为互斥选项的代价对齐。触发:"对上汇报 / 给老板汇报 /…
git:20261025.4eaa475 · audit A · 6 stars
how-to-write SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/how-to-write/SKILL.md · 「怎么写文字」的总纲——先按金字塔原理搭骨架(结论先行 / SCQA / MECE),再按读者定语气(人还是 agent、上级还是同侧),最后必须以新读者身份通读自检。管一切要给别人看的文字:文档、单据、报告、评审意见、讲稿、群消息、PR…
git:20261025.fb9d7b8 · audit A · 6 stars
peer-facing-writing SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/peer-facing-writing/SKILL.md · 写给同事看的文本(GitLab 单据、飞书文档、评审意见、群消息、PR review、跨团队报告)的语气与结构规范,基于职场协作与社会心理学。触发:"提单 / 写报告 / 写文档给 QA 或后端 / 评审意见 / 回评 / 跨团队沟通 /…
git:20260910.b68d609 · audit A · 6 stars
platform-voices SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/platform-voices/SKILL.md · 「全平台表达风格与媒介心智」分册——按平台受众的心理账户匹配表达法则。涵盖网易云音乐(情怀/通感/夜读)、小红书(大情绪击穿/生活口语/高CTR)、Twitter/X(独立极客/反常识/短平快)、Reddit(零营销耐受/真实硬核/TL;D…
git:20261106.94b7d41 · audit A · 6 stars
scenario-openers SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/scenario-openers/SKILL.md · 「场景接待词、破冰与开场钩子库」分册——彻底剔除AI味,像真人一样在各种具体场合下开口。提供私信接待、客诉安抚、社区Issue回应、网易云神评开场、小红书大情绪钩子、X极客直击钩子等高细粒度原子语料。拒绝空洞升华与机器套话,追求真实的人味、…
git:20260926.5283a19 · audit A · 6 stars
talk-text-review SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/talk-text-review/SKILL.md · 讲稿/分享稿的文本验收——查的不是错别字,是**姿态**:这份稿子读起来是「我教你们」还是「我跟你们聊」。用心理逆反、自我暴露、认识论谦逊这几条机制,逐句找出会把听众推到对立面的表达并给出改写。触发词:讲稿验收、分享稿检查、这么讲会不会得罪…
v1.0.0 · audit A · 6 stars
talk-visual-review SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/talk-visual-review/SKILL.md · 演讲页/幻灯片的视觉验收——用浏览器实测每一屏是否被切、是否过空、对比度够不够、色板有没有绕过主题变量,而不是靠肉眼翻页目测。触发词:讲稿排版检查、幻灯片验收、内容溢出、投影看不全、slide 被切、演讲页视觉检查、talk…
v1.0.0 · audit A · 6 stars
technical-postmortem SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/technical-postmortem/SKILL.md · 严肃技术故障复盘、事故通报(Postmortem)与对外公关的表达规范。基于防御性工程与无指责复盘(Blameless Postmortem)原则,剔除空洞道歉与甩锅推诿,下钻到机制防线与量化事实。触发:"事故通报 / 写复盘 /…
git:20261025.4eaa475 · audit A · 6 stars

Every file in webkubor/writing-standard-skills

Browse by kind, by grade A, or by owner.