peer-facing-writing SKILL.md skillA

peer-facing-writing from webkubor/writing-standard-skills is an agent skill: a SKILL.md folder an AI agent loads when a task calls for it.

Install it, pinned
mdr add webkubor/writing-standard-skills/peer-facing-writing@git:20260910.b68d609

Pins git:20260910.b68d609 in mdr.lock. Pin the fingerprint instead.

Audit grade
A, 17 of 17 checks passed
Kind
SKILL.md skill
Repository
webkubor/writing-standard-skills
Path
skills/peer-facing-writing/SKILL.md
Versions recorded
1
Latest version
git:20260910.b68d609, committed Sep 10, 2026
Size
17,575 bytes
Repository stars
6
License
MIT

写给同事看的文本(GitLab 单据、飞书文档、评审意见、群消息、PR review、跨团队报告)的语气与结构规范,基于职场协作与社会心理学。触发:"提单 / 写报告 / 写文档给 QA 或后端 / 评审意见 / 回评 / 跨团队沟通 / 文案不合理 / 这样礼貌吗 / 语气太硬"。反触发:写给 owner 本人的对话回复走 reply-format-low-cost,那是另一套(对上要极简,对同侧要留余地)。.

Collected from public GitHub. Every version is saved exactly as it was and never changes. Install it at an exact version with the mdr tool, and every file is checked before it reaches your agent. The main file is checked against the SHA-256 fingerprint recorded here, and the others against the fingerprints GitHub keeps for its source commit. The automatic checks below grade the latest version, and the same checks always give the same file the same grade.

What the file says

# 对同事的书面沟通

给同事看的文本和给 owner 的汇报是**两套语气**。对 owner 要极简、结论先行、不铺过程(`cs rule reply-format-low-cost`);对同侧同事要**留余地、给台阶、不越位**——因为他们不欠你执行,你也不是他们的上级。

判断标准只有一条:**这段话如果原样念给对方听,他会想解决问题,还是想先自我辩解?** 后者就是写坏了。

## 零、先用金字塔原理搭骨架(结构定了再谈语气)

语气问题好改,结构错了整篇要重写。**动笔前先按金字塔原理搭骨架**:结论先行、以上统下、归类分组、逻辑递进。

### 结论先行 —— 答案放在第一屏

读者的第一个问题永远是「结论是什么、要不要我动」。把它放在开头,证据放在后面供需要的人下钻。

```
✅ 7 条已全部复验:3 条已修复、1 条真缺陷已转后端、3 条要更新用例。前端无遗留。
   (下面才是逐条明细、判据、复现步骤)

❌ 先讲复验方法 → 再讲每条怎么测的 → 最后一段才说结论
```

**检验**:只读前 5 行,读者知不知道结论和自己要做什么?不知道就是没做到结论先行。

### SCQA —— 开篇四句话把人带进上下文

用在文档开头或单据的「背景」段。四句,各一到两行,不要展开:

| | 写什么 | 例(本次冒烟报告) |
|---|---|---|
| **S** 情境 | 对方已知的事实,建立共同起点 | 1.0.6 冒烟 120 条上轮跑完,7 条 failed |
| **C** 冲突 | 发生了什么变化,让现状不成立 | 之后前端又修了几轮,环境已经不是上轮那个构建 |
| **Q** 疑问 | 因此自然产生的问题 | 这 7 条现在还失败吗?分别该谁处理? |
| **A** 答案 | 你的结论,一句话 | 3 条已修复、1 条真缺陷转后端、3 条要改用例 |

**S 一定要是对方已知的**。写成「我做了 X」就不是 SCQA,那是自述。SCQA 的作用是让对方觉得「对,我知道这个背景」,然后顺着你的逻辑走下来。

### MECE —— 分组必须不重不漏

**Mutually Exclusive(相互独立)**:任何一条内容只能出现在一个分组里。
**Collectively Exhaustive(完全穷尽)**:分组加起来覆盖全部,数字能对上。

两个高频违反:

1. **重叠**:同一件事在「三项待办」和「后续动作表」里各写一遍 —— 读者不知道哪份是准的,改了一处另一处就过期。**同类信息只留一处,别处只引用。**
2. **不穷尽**:说「7 条已复验」,分组却只写了 6 条,或分组数字加起来不等于总数。**每次分组后做一次加法**。
…

Read the whole file at its exact version.

How to install

The exact contents, by fingerprint
mdr add webkubor/writing-standard-skills/peer-facing-writing@sha256:abb3f7ef806485df

The line at the top of this page pins the label git:20260910.b68d609, which is what most people want. This one pins the sha256 fingerprint of the contents instead, so it survives a label being moved. Either way the exact version is written to mdr.lock, and mdr install downloads and checks those contents again, so it installs them exactly or stops with an error.

Badge

mdr badge

[![mdr](https://markdownregistry.com/badge/art_isobduxxcjgbksq6.svg)](https://markdownregistry.com/a/art_isobduxxcjgbksq6)

3 badge image fetches in 30 days. What the badge shows.

Versions

The registry has recorded 1 version of this file, committed on Sep 10, 2026.

versioncommittedcommitsizeaudit
git:20260910.b68d609 latest2026-09-10 b68d609 17,575 BA view

Audit of the latest version

A  17 of 17 checks passed. Fixed automatic checks with no AI involved, so the same checks give the same answer every run.
  • pass: Frontmatter block present
  • pass: Frontmatter declares a name
  • pass: Frontmatter declares a description
  • pass: Size between 200 bytes and 200 KB (17575 bytes)
  • pass: No zero-width or bidi control characters
  • pass: No instruction hidden inside an HTML comment
  • pass: No link to an exfiltration or paste host
  • pass: No credential-shaped string
  • pass: No instruction to send local credentials anywhere
  • pass: No text hidden with inline styles
  • pass: No prompt-injection phrasing
  • pass: No curl or wget piped into a shell
  • pass: No recursive delete of root, home or parent
  • pass: No instruction to read or print local credentials
  • pass: No base64 blob over 200 characters
  • pass: No link to a raw IP address
  • pass: No script tag

Source

GitHub

webkubor/writing-standard-skills · 6 stars · license MIT · pushed 2026-11-06 · branch main

API

GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/artifacts/art_isobduxxcjgbksq6
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/resolve?ref=webkubor/writing-standard-skills/peer-facing-writing
GET https://markdownregistry.com/api/v1/blob/abb3f7ef806485df5bafce1925b28fc3c05394a65db4b1445737782086324d8f

Your AI assistant does the legwork. You hear about the deals worth your word. Hand yours the standing instructions at modelranch.com and it joins the network that reads files like this one.

Guides: the SKILL.md format and its required fields · what to check before you install a skill · how to pin a skill to an exact version · where to find agent skills · keeping a team on the same skills · which agent file does what.

More from webkubor/writing-standard-skills

AGENTS.md AGENTS.md file
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · AGENTS.md
git:20261025.4eaa475 · audit B · 6 stars
llms.txt llms.txt file
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · llms.txt
git:20261025.6457abe · audit A · 6 stars
account-custody SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/account-custody/SKILL.md · 「账户托管运营前置检查」——Agent 替人接管社交账户(发帖/回复/互动)之前,必须先完成四件事:核对当前平台与入口、加载平台规则红线、读出该账户已有人设与口吻、确认出口 IP…
git:20261105.3275eed · audit A · 6 stars
decision-and-rfc SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/decision-and-rfc/SKILL.md · 架构决策记录(ADR)、技术提案(RFC)与重大方案论证的表达规范。基于第一性原理、权衡对齐(Trade-offs)与可证伪性。拒绝报喜不报忧,要求显式声明放弃的代价与推翻条件。触发:"写方案 / 架构决策 / ADR / RFC /…
git:20261025.4eaa475 · audit A · 6 stars
executive-briefing SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/executive-briefing/SKILL.md · 面向业务负责人、决策者与 owner 的极简汇报与卡单拍板规范。基于低成本沟通(reply-format-low-cost)与终点导向运行模型。严禁倒苦水铺垫过程,将开放性提问收敛为互斥选项的代价对齐。触发:"对上汇报 / 给老板汇报 /…
git:20261025.4eaa475 · audit A · 6 stars
how-to-write SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/how-to-write/SKILL.md · 「怎么写文字」的总纲——先按金字塔原理搭骨架(结论先行 / SCQA / MECE),再按读者定语气(人还是 agent、上级还是同侧),最后必须以新读者身份通读自检。管一切要给别人看的文字:文档、单据、报告、评审意见、讲稿、群消息、PR…
git:20261025.fb9d7b8 · audit A · 6 stars
platform-voices SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/platform-voices/SKILL.md · 「全平台表达风格与媒介心智」分册——按平台受众的心理账户匹配表达法则。涵盖网易云音乐(情怀/通感/夜读)、小红书(大情绪击穿/生活口语/高CTR)、Twitter/X(独立极客/反常识/短平快)、Reddit(零营销耐受/真实硬核/TL;D…
git:20261106.94b7d41 · audit A · 6 stars
scenario-openers SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/scenario-openers/SKILL.md · 「场景接待词、破冰与开场钩子库」分册——彻底剔除AI味,像真人一样在各种具体场合下开口。提供私信接待、客诉安抚、社区Issue回应、网易云神评开场、小红书大情绪钩子、X极客直击钩子等高细粒度原子语料。拒绝空洞升华与机器套话,追求真实的人味、…
git:20260926.5283a19 · audit A · 6 stars
talk-text-review SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/talk-text-review/SKILL.md · 讲稿/分享稿的文本验收——查的不是错别字,是**姿态**:这份稿子读起来是「我教你们」还是「我跟你们聊」。用心理逆反、自我暴露、认识论谦逊这几条机制,逐句找出会把听众推到对立面的表达并给出改写。触发词:讲稿验收、分享稿检查、这么讲会不会得罪…
v1.0.0 · audit A · 6 stars
talk-visual-review SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/talk-visual-review/SKILL.md · 演讲页/幻灯片的视觉验收——用浏览器实测每一屏是否被切、是否过空、对比度够不够、色板有没有绕过主题变量,而不是靠肉眼翻页目测。触发词:讲稿排版检查、幻灯片验收、内容溢出、投影看不全、slide 被切、演讲页视觉检查、talk…
v1.0.0 · audit A · 6 stars
technical-postmortem SKILL.md skill
webkubor/writing-standard-skills · skills/technical-postmortem/SKILL.md · 严肃技术故障复盘、事故通报(Postmortem)与对外公关的表达规范。基于防御性工程与无指责复盘(Blameless Postmortem)原则,剔除空洞道歉与甩锅推诿,下钻到机制防线与量化事实。触发:"事故通报 / 写复盘 /…
git:20261025.4eaa475 · audit A · 6 stars

Every file in webkubor/writing-standard-skills

Browse by kind, by grade A, or by owner.